Canine-11
Why Americans are obsessed with "rescuing"
dogs.
By Jon Katz
Posted Tuesday, June 3, 2003, at 7:46 AM PT
I was walking in a nearby park recently when an enormous
mutt—a Lab/shepherd mix, from the looks of it—came bounding down the wooded
path, plowed into my belly, and knocked me down, touching off a spirited tiff
with my two border collies.
As I clambered to my feet, a middle-aged man came
chugging up, agitated and out-of-breath. He began belatedly scolding the genial
and oblivious dog, whose name was Bear, explaining that Bear was a rescued dog,
"probably abused." So the guy—who introduced himself as
Stan—didn't want to train him to come, sit, or stop ricocheting into people,
not yet; Bear had been through so much heartache already. He did lecture
Bear —"no," "bad dog," "why don't you listen to
me?"—long after the fact and well beyond the point of usefulness.
Finding Bear was no cinch, it turned out. Stan told me
he had combed animal shelters for months but found that in the Northeast, at
least, the number of abandoned and adoptable dogs has fallen in recent years;
new leash laws had resulted in fewer lost and straying dogs, and a sharp rise
in neutering and spaying meant fewer dogs running around period. Stan didn't
want to simply buy some fancy purebred pet, he explained, not when there were
so many creatures in need. He preferred to save one from misery, possibly even
death.
So Stan went online and located Bear not in New Jersey,
where we lived, but in a "foster home" in Alabama, via a rescue site
listed on Petfinder.com.
The demand for "rescued" dogs is so great that groups often have to
scour faraway rural areas these days to find abused dogs for people to adopt.
Bear was transported north, by volunteer
"transporters" located via mailing lists on the Net, and delivered to
a local New Jersey "fosterer" for evaluation. "Screeners"
check possible homes and new owners. Stan and his home and family were
thoroughly evaluated before he was permitted to bring Bear home. "Believe
me," he said with some pride, "it was easier for me to buy a house
than to get this dog." The screeners returned more than once and let him
know they would be back periodically. He signed a document promising to care
for the dog and to never let the dog walk off-leash.
Now he was crazy about the dog, he confessed. It
seemed to me that at least part of that feeling stemmed from his pride in
having spared the animal a grim fate.
How did he know that Bear had been abused? I asked.
"You can just tell," Stan assured me. "It's obvious. If you come
near him with a leash or collar or stick, he looks terrified."
I'd heard such stories countless times. It needs to be
said that there are innumerable and well documented stories of horrific abuse
inflicted on dogs. At a Brooklyn shelter I visited a few months ago, I saw dogs
that had been burned almost to death, abandoned, starved, poisoned, nearly
drowned, beaten, and horribly mauled after being used as training fodder for
fighting dogs. Rescue volunteers go to extraordinary lengths to save and care
for these dogs.
But many professional trainers and dog lovers have
become wary. They often roll their eyes when people explain that their dogs
have been abused, seeing that as an excuse for obnoxious or aggressive behavior
and as a way to avoid the effort of training. Many also sense a need for some
dog owners to see their pets as suffering victims, rather than animals.
Pet behaviorists will tell you that it's usually
impossible to know what dogs have actually been through, since they can't tell
us. Dogs who are simply adjusting to new homes or poor training frequently show
the same behaviors as ill-treated dogs: cowering, trembling, eliminating,
shying away from the unfamiliar.
But dogs, like so many other things, are a mirror of
the society we—and they—live in. And a growing number of Americans not only
need to rescue a creature, but to perceive those creatures as having been
mistreated. Somehow, our dogs have joined us in our culture of victimization.
Since we can only guess what has happened to them, they are blank canvases on
which we can paint anything we wish. Add to this the fact that millions of dogs
are indeed abandoned or maltreated and do need homes, and it becomes clearer
why animal rescue is a booming social phenomenon.
The dog rescue movement is relatively new. A generation
ago, a person in need of a pet went to a breeder or to a local dog pound.
There, he or she "adopted" rather than "rescued" a dog.
There was and is no numerical shortage of abandoned dogs: The Humane Society of
the United States estimates that between 8 million and 10 million enter the
U.S. animal shelter system each year, with about 5 million unable to find homes
and euthanized. It's worth noting that nobody really has any idea how many of
these are actually abused.
But this hardly matters. Rescue workers have become
the special forces of the dog world: dedicated, fearless, driven, intensely
organized, wily, and resourceful.
The Internet has propelled and shaped this movement.
Type "dog rescue" into Google, and more than 700,000 references pop
up. Rescue groups have formed for almost every breed in almost every city and
state, some with scores of members, fund-raising campaigns, sometimes their own
vans, plus badges, caps, T-shirts, and bumper stickers. Through this national
network of sites and lists, dogs can be rescued, re-rescued
("re-homed" is the preferred term), and transported all over America.
Thanks to sites like the online clearinghouse Petfinder, any dog in need of a
home can be eyeballed by anybody in the country with a computer. Last week,
Petfinder had nearly 100,000 "adoptable pets" on its Web site, with
sophisticated software that permits potential adopters to search databases for
the pet: What breed? What age? What color? Housebroken? Deaf, blind, or
injured?
Rescue fantasies are familiar to therapists, who see
them particularly in people who were themselves mistreated or ached for escape
from loneliness and alienation.
Some rescue workers have encountered people they call
"hoarders" or "compulsives"—that is, rescuers with a
dozen or more dogs. Hoarders are especially drawn to hopeless cases, dogs that
are severely injured or especially aggressive. They are often confident that
they can "flip" the dog around. And sometimes, they simply can't say
no.
Rescues can also provide an outlet for thwarted
political inclinations. Social problems seem overwhelming, government remote.
People can't easily stop a war or even get a stop sign installed on their
blocks. But as a neighbor of mine explained, "I can't seem to do much for
people these days, so the least I can do is rescue a dog." In
sophisticated cities and their suburbs—New York, Washington, San
Francisco—where everything makes a political statement and children are
always being taught "values," it means something to have rescued a
dog as opposed to having simply bought one.
Something buried in the psyches of certain dog-owners
needs to alter animals' fates and leads them to see those animals as having
suffered. Owners of rescued dogs I have talked to tend to have holes of one
sort or another in their lives: "Saving" an "abused" dog
can sometimes fill that hole. It makes the owner a hero: a literal savior. It
makes the owner necessary: This poor abused creature can't possibly live
without the person who saved it from misery and death. And it gives the owner a
willing, and ever grateful, target of endless love.
But while the lavish and forgiving affection showered
on rescued dogs may be psychologically satisfying for the pet owner, it isn't
always good for the animal. Seeing a dog as a victim in need of rescue, too
traumatized to be confined or to learn simple commands and behaviors, actually
impedes proper care. It undermines a dog's ability to be well-socialized, to
live happily in a home, and to coexist with humans in general. Dogs like to be
trained. It calms them, gives them a sense of order. When we respond to them in
terms of our own needs, rather than theirs, we do them no favors.
|
|
A
Dog Year: Twelve Months, Four Dogs, and Me - Jon Katz
|
Jon Katz is the author of A Dog Year: Twelve Months,
Four Dogs and Me, recently published in paperback, and
. He can be e-mailed at
jonkatz3@comcast.net
.
Illustrations by Nina Frenkel.
|