Articles & Viewpoints

 

 

Home
Monroe Mill Girls
Dogs Up For Adoption

Nina the Queen

Babette
Blanca & MicahBina
Forrest
Miranda
Dolly
Cricket & Pudgie
Sarah
Simone
SynJin
Toni
Our Friends
Holland Windmills
My Other Interests
My Rescue Family
How to Help a Rescue
Critter's Rescue Stories
Happy Endings
Happy Endings 2
Views & News
Views & News 2
Views & News 3
Just For Fun 1
Just For Fun 2
Just For Fun 3
Just For Fun 4
Just For Fun 5
Links 1
Links 2
Links 3
Links 4
Honor
No PuppyMills NC Branch 1
No PuppyMills NC Branch 2
No PuppyMills NC Branch 3
Abby's World
Monica's World
Canine Ehrlichiosis
Canine Nutrition
Patella Luxation
Coccidia
Elders and Aging
Epilepsy
Pancreatitis
Ear Care
Elder Care: Canine Arthritis
The Tellington Touch
Elder Care:
Canine Cognitive Dysfunction
Tribute to Elders & Special Needs
AKC Chihuahua Standard
AKC Chinese Crested  & Xolo Standard
AKC Pomeranian Standard
AKC Poodle Standard
JRTCA Breed Standard
Fundraisers
Gone Home
Pete the Healer
Wake Veterinary Hospital 1
Wake Veterinary Hospital 2

 

 

 

Canine-11
Why Americans are obsessed with "rescuing" dogs.
By Jon Katz
Posted Tuesday, June 3, 2003, at 7:46 AM PT

Illustration by Nina Frenkel
I was walking in a nearby park recently when an enormous mutt—a Lab/shepherd mix, from the looks of it—came bounding down the wooded path, plowed into my belly, and knocked me down, touching off a spirited tiff with my two border collies.

As I clambered to my feet, a middle-aged man came chugging up, agitated and out-of-breath. He began belatedly scolding the genial and oblivious dog, whose name was Bear, explaining that Bear was a rescued dog, "probably abused." So the guy—who introduced himself as Stan—didn't want to train him to come, sit, or stop ricocheting into people, not yet; Bear had been through so much heartache already. He did lecture Bear —"no," "bad dog," "why don't you listen to me?"—long after the fact and well beyond the point of usefulness.

Finding Bear was no cinch, it turned out. Stan told me he had combed animal shelters for months but found that in the Northeast, at least, the number of abandoned and adoptable dogs has fallen in recent years; new leash laws had resulted in fewer lost and straying dogs, and a sharp rise in neutering and spaying meant fewer dogs running around period. Stan didn't want to simply buy some fancy purebred pet, he explained, not when there were so many creatures in need. He preferred to save one from misery, possibly even death.

So Stan went online and located Bear not in New Jersey, where we lived, but in a "foster home" in Alabama, via a rescue site listed on Petfinder.com. The demand for "rescued" dogs is so great that groups often have to scour faraway rural areas these days to find abused dogs for people to adopt.

Bear was transported north, by volunteer "transporters" located via mailing lists on the Net, and delivered to a local New Jersey "fosterer" for evaluation. "Screeners" check possible homes and new owners. Stan and his home and family were thoroughly evaluated before he was permitted to bring Bear home. "Believe me," he said with some pride, "it was easier for me to buy a house than to get this dog." The screeners returned more than once and let him know they would be back periodically. He signed a document promising to care for the dog and to never let the dog walk off-leash.

Now he was crazy about the dog, he confessed. It seemed to me that at least part of that feeling stemmed from his pride in having spared the animal a grim fate.

How did he know that Bear had been abused? I asked. "You can just tell," Stan assured me. "It's obvious. If you come near him with a leash or collar or stick, he looks terrified."

I'd heard such stories countless times. It needs to be said that there are innumerable and well documented stories of horrific abuse inflicted on dogs. At a Brooklyn shelter I visited a few months ago, I saw dogs that had been burned almost to death, abandoned, starved, poisoned, nearly drowned, beaten, and horribly mauled after being used as training fodder for fighting dogs. Rescue volunteers go to extraordinary lengths to save and care for these dogs.

But many professional trainers and dog lovers have become wary. They often roll their eyes when people explain that their dogs have been abused, seeing that as an excuse for obnoxious or aggressive behavior and as a way to avoid the effort of training. Many also sense a need for some dog owners to see their pets as suffering victims, rather than animals.

Pet behaviorists will tell you that it's usually impossible to know what dogs have actually been through, since they can't tell us. Dogs who are simply adjusting to new homes or poor training frequently show the same behaviors as ill-treated dogs: cowering, trembling, eliminating, shying away from the unfamiliar.

But dogs, like so many other things, are a mirror of the society we—and they—live in. And a growing number of Americans not only need to rescue a creature, but to perceive those creatures as having been mistreated. Somehow, our dogs have joined us in our culture of victimization. Since we can only guess what has happened to them, they are blank canvases on which we can paint anything we wish. Add to this the fact that millions of dogs are indeed abandoned or maltreated and do need homes, and it becomes clearer why animal rescue is a booming social phenomenon.

The dog rescue movement is relatively new. A generation ago, a person in need of a pet went to a breeder or to a local dog pound. There, he or she "adopted" rather than "rescued" a dog. There was and is no numerical shortage of abandoned dogs: The Humane Society of the United States estimates that between 8 million and 10 million enter the U.S. animal shelter system each year, with about 5 million unable to find homes and euthanized. It's worth noting that nobody really has any idea how many of these are actually abused.

But this hardly matters. Rescue workers have become the special forces of the dog world: dedicated, fearless, driven, intensely organized, wily, and resourceful.

The Internet has propelled and shaped this movement. Type "dog rescue" into Google, and more than 700,000 references pop up. Rescue groups have formed for almost every breed in almost every city and state, some with scores of members, fund-raising campaigns, sometimes their own vans, plus badges, caps, T-shirts, and bumper stickers. Through this national network of sites and lists, dogs can be rescued, re-rescued ("re-homed" is the preferred term), and transported all over America. Thanks to sites like the online clearinghouse Petfinder, any dog in need of a home can be eyeballed by anybody in the country with a computer. Last week, Petfinder had nearly 100,000 "adoptable pets" on its Web site, with sophisticated software that permits potential adopters to search databases for the pet: What breed? What age? What color? Housebroken? Deaf, blind, or injured?

Rescue fantasies are familiar to therapists, who see them particularly in people who were themselves mistreated or ached for escape from loneliness and alienation.

Some rescue workers have encountered people they call "hoarders" or "compulsives"—that is, rescuers with a dozen or more dogs. Hoarders are especially drawn to hopeless cases, dogs that are severely injured or especially aggressive. They are often confident that they can "flip" the dog around. And sometimes, they simply can't say no.

Rescues can also provide an outlet for thwarted political inclinations. Social problems seem overwhelming, government remote. People can't easily stop a war or even get a stop sign installed on their blocks. But as a neighbor of mine explained, "I can't seem to do much for people these days, so the least I can do is rescue a dog." In sophisticated cities and their suburbs—New York, Washington, San Francisco—where everything makes a political statement and children are always being taught "values," it means something to have rescued a dog as opposed to having simply bought one.

Something buried in the psyches of certain dog-owners needs to alter animals' fates and leads them to see those animals as having suffered. Owners of rescued dogs I have talked to tend to have holes of one sort or another in their lives: "Saving" an "abused" dog can sometimes fill that hole. It makes the owner a hero: a literal savior. It makes the owner necessary: This poor abused creature can't possibly live without the person who saved it from misery and death. And it gives the owner a willing, and ever grateful, target of endless love.

But while the lavish and forgiving affection showered on rescued dogs may be psychologically satisfying for the pet owner, it isn't always good for the animal. Seeing a dog as a victim in need of rescue, too traumatized to be confined or to learn simple commands and behaviors, actually impedes proper care. It undermines a dog's ability to be well-socialized, to live happily in a home, and to coexist with humans in general. Dogs like to be trained. It calms them, gives them a sense of order. When we respond to them in terms of our own needs, rather than theirs, we do them no favors.

A Dog Year: Twelve Months, Four Dogs, and Me - Jon Katz
A Dog Year: Twelve Months, Four Dogs, and Me - Jon Katz
 

Jon Katz is the author of A Dog Year: Twelve Months, Four Dogs and Me, recently published in paperback, and . He can be e-mailed at
jonkatz3@comcast.net .

Illustrations by Nina Frenkel.


 
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE TO THE PRESS
 
Dogs Deserve Better Invites Palm Beach County Administrator
to See How The Other Dogs Live
 
"I do not like the ordinance. I thought it was overregulation," said Palm
Beach County Administrator Weisman, of the new ordinance prohibiting
chaining of dogs between the hours of 10 a.m. and 5 p.m. He says his dogs,
Kylie and Brady "are wonderfully taken care of. They're never left outside
tied up. This (law) doesn't make a distinction."
 
Dogs Deserve Better, an organization working to get dogs off chains, out of
pens, and into the homes, understands that any law prohibiting or limiting
chaining will anger and inconvenience some who use tethering in a more
responsible manner than most. But it also angers and inconveniences those
who don?t.
 
And more importantly, forces them into appropriate action.
 
Says Tammy Sneath Grimes, founder of Dogs Deserve Better, "We know that
those who are genuinely responsible caregivers will find another way to make
things work. They will fence their yards, they will use a leash. And while
they may initially feel inconvenienced, we ask them to look outside
themselves, outside their own yard, past their own well-taken-care-of dogs.
Look down the street at the poor shepherd baking day after day in it?s own
parasite-ridden excrement.
 
?This law gives hope to that dog. Any dog caretaker with an ounce of
compassion would not begrudge that dog some hope because they are
temporarily inconvenienced.?
 
According to Grimes, ?The sad fact remains that the majority of dogs who are
tethered are not tethered for one or two hours or even ten. They are
tethered, chained, penned for life. They are not walked or played with.
They?ve never been to a vet, seldom have a rabies shot or a license, and
because they are forced to east, sleep, urinate and defecate in the same
small area often are full of parasitic worms: whipworms, heartworms,
hookworms, roundworms, tapeworms.?
 
Marcy LaHart, a Palm Beach county resident attorney that specializes in
animal law, recently took reporter Palm Beach Post deputy editorial page
editor Jac VerSteeg on a walking tour of the 9 chained dogs in her area.
She, along with Dogs Deserve Better, invites Mr. Weisman to take the same
eye-opening tour with her.
 
According to LaHart, "a study by the Center for Disease Control indicated
that a chained dog is 2.8 times more likely to bite. Chained dogs are
responsible for a disproportionate number of fatal attacks, and tragically,
the victims are most often children. The ordinance makes Palm Beach County a
safer and more humane community."
 
"In addition to the public safety issue," Says LaHart, ?pet ownership is a
privilege, and if people are not willing to provide their dogs with secure,
comfortable housing, proper training, adequate socialization and exercise,
they should not have them. If this ordinance is enforced it will mean a big
improvement in the lives of many dogs in my neighborhood. Come for a
walk‹I'll introduce you to them them.?
 
Tammy Sneath Grimes, Founder
Dogs Deserve Better
No Chains!
Make a Dog's Life Worth Living
************
 
Make a Difference in a Chained Dog's Life!
Change Laws. Educate Society. Volunteer your Time. Foster a Chained Dog.
The More You Stand With Us, The More Chains We Will Break, Together!
Donate Fencing, Training, Time, Crates, Corporate Sponsorship.
They Deserve Better!

 

http://www.animalnetwork.com/petindustry/vpn/toc.asp
Vets Lax on Deramaxx Consent, FDA Says
By Somyr McLean  
Veterinary Practice News: August 2003

A cavalier attitude among veterinarians toward prescribing Deramaxx
(deracoxib) may be resulting in unnecessary adverse experiences, according to the Food and Drug Administration's Center for Veterinary Medicine.

More than 300 adverse drug experience (ADE) reports for the Novartis drug had been reported to the CVM as of June 4, 2003. Many callers to the ADE hotline
said they never received an information sheet from their veterinarian, according to the FDA.

"There has been full disclosure [about the drug's side effects] by the FDA and the manufacturer, but not necessarily by veterinarians," the FDA said via
e-mail.

"Many of the callers and reporters to the CVM hotline tell us that they never received a client information sheet, their dog never had pre-drug blood
testing, and/or their veterinarian denied that the side effects could be attributed to the drug even though the side effects are noted on the client information
sheet and the label."

Deramaxx is a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory cox-2 inhibitor indicated for the postoperative pain and inflammation associated with orthopedic surgery in
dogs and for the control of pain and inflammation associated with osteoarthritis in dogs, according to Novartis.

Some of the most common side effects reported to the FDA are vomiting, anorexia, elevated kidney and liver blood values and diarrhea. ADE reports, listed
on the FDA's Web site at
www.fda.gov/cvm/index/ade/ADEReport.htm, highlight signs, frequency and the number of deaths associated with a drug reaction. To
date, 79 dogs have died while taking Deramaxx. Although these deaths have not been linked to Deramaxx usage, the FDA considers the number low.

"Most of the effects that have been seen are well known to occur with all non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. [The effects] are all mentioned in the
client information sheet. They are predictable and associated with off-label use or in dogs who are not good candidates," the FDA said.

Dr. John Cary, manager of technical services for Novartis Animal Health, said that the ADE reports for Deramaxx are consistent with the company's
expectations and that the number of reports were low considering the number of dogs taking the drug.

There has been consumer backlash at the FDA and Novartis on several Internet sites as the number of Deramaxx ADE reports increase.

"Consumers should know that with time and new drugs, labels can change post-marketing information that may include new concerns. [Consumers] should always look for the most recent information," the FDA said. "Veterinarians are required to hand out client information sheets under an informed consent practice
that is inherent in good clinical practice but not mandated in any form except by various state practice acts. These are understood professional standards of
conduct."

Novartis made the decision to distribute a CIS with the Deramaxx label even though the FDA did not require that one be included, according to Dr. David
Stansfield, director of professional services at Novartis Animal Health. He said that the information sheets are a friendly way of explaining, in lay terms, to
the consumer the drug's possible side effects and appropriate conditions under which a pet should be given the drug.

"We have distributed 4 million client information sheets and I think that veterinarians are distributing them responsibly to their clients," Dr. Stansfield said.

However, when a dog has a reaction to the drug, Novartis is aggressively investigating and documenting reports.

"We will provide to consumers, on a case by case basis, the financial support needed for diagnostics to investigate whether or not the drug caused an
adverse reaction," Dr. Cary said.

Stansfield said that Novartis continues to invest in educating veterinarians on current and upcoming information on Deramaxx. He said the responsibility
ultimately lies with veterinarians to dispense the drug responsibly.Somyr McLean

 

 

Website designs by Swiftwater Innovations Copyright © 2002 - All Rights Reserved

 Original textual content and photos by LGHN. Copyright © 2002 - All Rights Reserved

Updated 01-11-04